[Release] Complete AdvancedItemFilter - Save only item with good affixes. !!Beta!!

Alright so :

1) Which item is he missing ? I need to know that, there was some flaws in the code I just fixed (like few seconds ago) I need to work on the error handling as I did in the Identification feature coming in the next build, so the bot don't "stop/start" when an error is found.

2) It's supposed to fill the needs, you can stash currencies in their own tabs, quality gems, recipe items, 5L items, scraps & scrolls...

The upcoming version (I need to debug lot of things) will also allow you to set number of pieces of gear for recipes of each type.
<troll>
DBF also helps me in some ways to handle few things, but is also being a dick and telling me things don't work, when they do, so I need to understand why this deer can't make it.
</troll>

I need to run the plugin in a VM so I can make sure it runs well because some people will whine "hey it doesn't do shit in my vm, why" so it needs to be flawless (or almost)

If you can provide full logs, so I can see if anything related to AIF goes wrong. Thanks all

 

toNyx, i'll be online later, with a great will to help.

Let this deer make it! lol

/hat

 

More teasing !

 

Less teasing more releasing!

 

I'm surprised that you're still working so hard on the GUI. After pushebx mentioned changing over to a new gui base I stopped coding anything GUI intensive. Props to you though for doing it regardless

 

Hey DeliciousCyanide,
You learn things, even if it's redundant, hence why I've been doing GUI stuff too.
True, that mahApps will look like, but you need to understand the underlying concept to use it effectively =).

 

I've done a lot of work with .net before. The current GUI system for plugins is just irksome for me at the moment because of the lack of visual representation of where objects are being placed. Constantly restarting and reloading the plugin is just so much of a hassle for me and I don't distribute any of my stuff so I can just lazy man edit it ... in hindsight I could probably do it in M$VS and then port it over. I dunno, laziness.

 

The only things that will change in MahApps is the concept and the structure, the "idea" will still be the same, it's only part of the migration. And WPF has so much fun things to deal with.
And if I'm still working on the GUI, is because if I release a primary build now people will get lost and ask for the same features again and again. so it's sort of an anticipation

most of the stuff is working, today I install the computer in the new flat and run it for few hours, if it's good and don't have any flaws/crashes, expect a build, since I don't have much stuff to add anymore, things are pretty good as it is now. (After that I'll probably add a GCP recipe task)

As a proof it's almost fully working, I ran accidentally 24 hours straight with it enabled, went back to it and noticed, did all the stuff I could to shuffle currency to avoid any losses, and somehow discovered 10 exalts worth of currency

 

The hype is real! Looking forward to next build.

Just a question with this concept though. If say I wanted the bot ID crit or chaos implicit rings and leave the rest un-ID, would I need to set that up in my standard Itemfilter? And if so, would yours not overrule it?

 

Yep, the recipe thingy will override this filter since our evaluator ticks first.

But you can still add a specific filter in the evaluator yourself (with a bit of c# knowledge) because atm I'll stop upgrading the GUI, because it works as I need it to and I don't wanna add sort of a "custom rule creator" in it with the upcoming migration to MahApps.

If you add ID filters on top of the filtering before the recipes kicks in, you'll return a value and obviously override the chaos recipe checks.

 

After testing it again for a while I just caught it shuffeling/switching tabs for 30 minutes. Full log attached...

Click me

 

And plz fix
Today i see how he use rare 6S in chaos recipe)))

 

Yup, somehow it happened to me like few hours ago.

Want to exclude 6S from protection?

 

Well it is 7 jewels versus a few alteration shards using another rare chest. I'd prefer it to vendor the 6s than use it for the recipe.

 

if it's protected for a recipe then it's 2c, not 7jews
But I can exclude them... as you wish

 

What I'm talking about is the opportunity cost of using the 6s in a recipe versus using another unID. In that case, the opportunity cost is 7 jewels from vendoring the 6s versus some alt shards for a different random chest. Whether you use the 6s or not you are still getting 2c.

 

7 Jew is like 1 chaos)
so you loose 1 chaos to get 2 chaos
Today he sell 2 times

 

Well, you say that because you don't run hard as we do, and we probably don't care about losing 1 chaos lol but if you want I can remove the 6S rares from the checks. That's a matter of few lines

 

When is the next 'update'

 

Soon[SUP]TM[/SUP]