Should HB3 have full support for Garrison navigation?

meh do it after Legion stuff is dealt with.. No rush for the gold bots

 

Sounds like a waste of time, for both the developers and the endusers.

Garrisons got nothing to offer anymore, especially not now when the gold missions has been taken away.

 

Quest Mode should be number one - there're atm a lot of issues i think.
If that's been done, you can continue

 

This is not actual true, Garrison even after nerf can provide ~2k per toon (here is a video about it in whole: WoW 7.0.3 Garrison Gold Guide - Post 7.0 & Legion Setup - 1000g Daily - YouTube)
And i will be posting Guide how to maximize it and setup for it once i done with updating my products to HB3.

All in your hands, as at the end we do all for users. So it will be fixed only if people need it.

 

2k per toon isn't worth the risk of even using the bot imo. But sure, if people rather make 2k in a garrison than 20k in Legion, be my guest

 

2k per toon daily with 10+ toons isn't chump change...that's pretty significant for doing nothing but pressing start and being somewhere people can't report you.

 

You making not right conclusions - you do not need to exclude Legion if you have Garrison. Also 2k is per toon. So if you have 11 toons it will be 22k etc.

But sure, everyone are free to decide what he need - each person have own needs and goals.

Exactly

 

Yes ! and the sooner the better, Garrison offer the safest way to make golds, no one can see you in your garrison, never been banned, with tailoring and bag prices almost doubling since Legion + another profession like inscription or alchemy, that's 2k gold easily per toon for 15min on garrison botting and I'm not even couting the gold you can make with the Barn (price of sumptuous fur have tripled since Legion).

A big yes for me !

 

You realise people botting garrison have multiple accounts with 30-50 toons on it, it's not just to make 2k gold daily but more making 70-100k per day per account with the lowest banrate ever (+ not the necessity to have a 30€ expension)

 

my vote is no; only because I'd rather see effort towards polishing HB3, and working on LB.

Also; I'd rather see the community developers spend efforts working on newer Legion based efforts rather than going back and re-working code that isn't future-looking. There will be chances for bot-bases, plugins, etc. with Legion now that's it here. Can be looking for those or busy fixing old stuff. I know what I'd be doing.

 

My vote is yes. I am not saying it has to be a priority over the glaring bugs, but it should be possible to add support for it and Garrisons are in my eyes still a big part of the game.

 

Voted for yes. Not top of the list, especially as HB2 still working (how long? until next ninja? what comes then), but it should be fixed. You also don't remove BGBuddy too, because all botters using it are banned. The question is, where should this lead too? Only few people using Partybot -> remove!, Few people using Archaeologybuddy -> remove! No, please keep it updated as soon as you have the time to do so.

 

Would rather see world quest support long before garrison.

 

PartyBot will be added again soon. Ref Tony's post somewear.

 

That was not what I meant...sry for my english, it's not my native language
I wanted to say that botbases with a small userbase shouldn't be abandoned. If we're going that way, only Questing and Raidbot will remain...

 

I would like to see it, but after the legion stuff. Just so we have a 'complete' bot.

Just to be curious, what Legion stuff are we talking about? I have no idea what features or profiles are being developed by the HB team.

 

Just a small question: how long will this poll stay open? So when can we expect if or if not Garrisonbuddy will be continued. And what percentage do you need for a yes? ok, that were 2 questions

 

Alisha why are you making profiles and botbases for main characters or accounts that took too much investments? People simply afraid to bot on main because there were few banwaves for HBusers( i mean software).