Hi, I copied soixnteneuf's deck and made some changes and put the profile on rush and I have been having good results so far. This deck got me to rank 17 even. PROOF DECK Build: 0.2.340.52 ALL ARE RANKED
how would that normal deck beat players with alot of aoe like paladin equality cons equality pyromancer and faceless manipulator etc this deck is ok but playing agains people with a braind wouldnt lose of this deck
Yes obviously this is just putting as much minions on the field and rushing the face ignoring all the mobs. Your worst enemy is going to be AoE but if the enemy happens to not have good AoE removel then you are kinda guaranteed a win. The bot isn't smart enough to go non-aggro deck YET. Nope, because the bot is playing and not you, the bot will make really bad plays with those cards. That is why this is for the most part just minions minions and more minions. Just don't forget to put it on RUSH because this is just pure going for the face deck.
ye you right im letting the bot run now for an hour and im on 75% winrate i didnt know that small decks wil win u more game so i could use this deck for my paladin aswel? or do u have for each class a nice rush deck would u mind sharing it?
Unless the rogue has 2 backstabs + 2 shivs in his hand it is ok. If he weapons up turn 2/3, he doesn't drop any minion + hits your minion and gets damage. The whole idea of this deck is getting his HP really low and kill him in the end. So it is not a big deal. Yes this deck might be hard to deal with rogues but it isn't THAT bad against them.
Looks good the scarlet crusaders are indeed a good replacement. Have hunter on gold now But would you wanna help with me to create a solid priest deck for ranked?, play now with a murloc deck but its still not good enought for me Ill make a new thread so this stay on topic.
I will post my reply on your thread but thanks again for your hunter deck. You are the reason this deck exists now haha.
I made a few changes to your deck and will be running it today. Namely I replaced a couple of the commons with rares. No more crocolisk instead I added demolisher & questing adventurer. Sometimes those rare cards force your opponent to do dumb things. They won't wait on their remove spells and instead will blow them early in the game. After I run 8 or so hours I'll let you know how it goes.
I think I might also rip timberwolf out until the bot logic gets fixed. That seems to be the one card that gets misplayed the most in this deck. There doesn't seem to be any logic to "only use with other beasts" so it gets dropped with random cards all the time and ends up being useless.
Thank you gamingsynergies, please let us know how your deck goes and if it does well I will gladly switch over.
What the fuck is with people posting stats after 10-15 fucking games? atleast run it for 24 hours... thats like asking 10 people who they are voting for and electing the president based on that.
119 games 44.5% win rate. One thing I've started to notice is how many rush decks I find in low ranked games (18-20). If the logic on explosive trap was better, I'd say it is a must have in these decks. I'm going to play around a bit and see if I can find some defense. So far I lose about 80% of games to warlocks with rush decks. They would be insanely easy to beat with an explosive trap. I removed questing adventurer from the deck, the bot logic is so bad. Demolisher is a great card for this deck, I'd definitely recommend it.
105 TOTAL games with this screenshot: View attachment 129241 Eh~ its decent I suppose Started bot at Rank 17, came back to Rank 18
For the 10000000000000000 time... Attachements from the forum don't work... lol Stop using it and use external ones.
