• Visit Rebornbuddy
  • Visit Panda Profiles
  • Visit LLamamMagic
  • Honorbuddy may not be detected, at all.

    Discussion in 'Discussions (no Ban Reports here)' started by buzzkip, May 16, 2015.

    Thread Status:
    Not open for further replies.
    1. Botomaniac

      Botomaniac Member

      Joined:
      Apr 11, 2014
      Messages:
      85
      Likes Received:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      6
      Are you kidding me? He clearly just mentioned 64bit bots as a sidenote focusing his rebuttal on the "disconnect and detect" theory you posted.
       
    2. Crowley

      Crowley Member

      Joined:
      Jan 15, 2010
      Messages:
      967
      Likes Received:
      20
      Trophy Points:
      18
      Client exe. Nothing to do with Warden.
       
    3. air

      air Member

      Joined:
      Feb 24, 2015
      Messages:
      146
      Likes Received:
      4
      Trophy Points:
      18
      no need to scan processes. they have yours VolumeSerialNumber EthernetAdapterMAC etc info to Identity all your connected accounts.
       
    4. ROmulis2000

      ROmulis2000 New Member

      Joined:
      May 22, 2014
      Messages:
      61
      Likes Received:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      0
      This ..ALLL DAY. The fact that other bots that are free to use , are coded and maintained by less individuals for zero gain to the community are still running and had ZERO players banned during the honorbuddy banwave, should be what all of you are thinking about. The Honorbuddy Team may have won that one battle but could have been persuaded or strong armed from blizzard to give up the information on its users. How else would other bots not be affected while HB was bitch slapped ? Im not saying that HB ratted out its users for sure ...but looking at the evidence not many other conclusions to be drawn .

      We are all entitled to our own opinion how ever.


       
    5. CodenameG

      CodenameG New Member

      Joined:
      Jan 15, 2010
      Messages:
      38,369
      Likes Received:
      231
      Trophy Points:
      0
      trust me when i tell you thats not the case. LOTS have changed from the glider days, and if it was software detection, everyone would be perma banned, and thats not the case.
       
    6. Xarian

      Xarian Member

      Joined:
      Aug 31, 2013
      Messages:
      161
      Likes Received:
      11
      Trophy Points:
      18
      Why would everyone be permabanned? They are very confident in their proof, no bans are getting overtuned, pretty much everyone got banned.

      Ever occoured that maybe they simply chose to do 6 months? For the sole reason that maaaaybe it would convince a few people to return in 6 months, without a bot?
       
    7. ROmulis2000

      ROmulis2000 New Member

      Joined:
      May 22, 2014
      Messages:
      61
      Likes Received:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      0
      No i believe that they chose to do 6 months because Blizzard wants you botters to have hope on returning in 6 months. Hope = happy thoughts = purchase new sub to pass time until 6 months is up . If they banned everyone, half if not more of you might not even consider re subbing then blizz would lose even more subs over all as well as money. Blizzard is playing on your emotions and leaving you with hope on returning in 6 months ( to return as a botter or a legit player doesn't even play into there reason for making it 6 months) . Again ..you all should be looking at why other bots weren't hit or detected while honor buddy was.

      None of you should bother to re sub back to blizzard . I seen a post where it says if you pay with your bank account or card or what ever you can tell your bank that you don't know what these charges are and be refunded up to 5 months back . So all of you ESPECIALLY the ones that have multiple accounts should definitely do this, it will most likely result in a per ma ban for your wow accounts. How ever ....blizz will take a hit on money as well ...if they did pay off the buddy team ....they will lose the money they spent on doing that...AND all of us charging back 5 months of game play on our bank accounts. They may have hit us.....but we can hit them even harder 5 times harder to be exact. ( if you only play 1 account and we base it off 100 000 players being banned . They would be charged back 8 000 000 . Who would get the last laugh then blizzard ??? )

      TO TOP THIS OFF...each of you that was banned should write 2 bad reviews a month for the next 6 months. Lets say that 100 000 players were banned ..in 6 months we could have 1200 000 bad reviews done up on blizzard games. Bad reviews on this company will also deter new gamers from touching anything this company puts out....which will also be a good way of hitting them in the bank account where it hurts.

      just my two cents

       
      Last edited: May 17, 2015
    8. Aetheric

      Aetheric Member

      Joined:
      Jul 25, 2012
      Messages:
      576
      Likes Received:
      2
      Trophy Points:
      18
      "Trust me when I tell you that's not the case.....and if it was software detection, everyone would be perma banned..."

      Coming from an "insider", this is a very interesting statement.

      You are telling your community that it can not be a software based detection - so what is it then?
      It's hard to believe that Blizzard hired thousands of people to manually scan the clients and manually administered and banned more than a 100,000 accounts.
      Overnight ...

      The BOSSLAND statement, a few days ago, kind of tells us that HB may have been detected.
      It's an automated process, based on _something_ ..

      Alright, so "I trust you", but be slightly more precise then - what's your theory, being an insider ..
       
    9. chinajade

      chinajade Well-Known Member Moderator Buddy Core Dev

      Joined:
      Jul 20, 2010
      Messages:
      17,540
      Likes Received:
      172
      Trophy Points:
      63
      Thread closed. Too much speculation, and drawing wrong conclusions.
      Please go speculate in another venue. Such things are explicitly disallowed.

      cj
       
      frosticus likes this.
    Thread Status:
    Not open for further replies.

    Share This Page