Announcement: Legendary Buddy from 1st June 2016

I like HB but its not only on the radar they an and will ban whenever they feel like it.
I am betting a big ban wave just before legacy.

The new Legendarybuddy...come on you know that buzzard has at least one membership if not more.
Tell us something about it I don't want to ask buzzard.

If its something entirely new that they can't detect then fine say so and I will join.

 

Well they just tried to ban and tripwire saved us (another bot got banwaved). So if they could ban whenever they want there would be no failed attempts to ban us. So your statement is factually wrong. HB is amazingly safe CONSIDERING the fact bliz only targets HB (deliberately, to fool people into thinking other bots are safe) but as soon as enough users move to other bots watch the banhammer fall on them because they have nothing like the tripwire helping them to avoid the bliz spyware I read in ban report section people blaming bans on HB when they had been using other bots!! It's ridiculous, if you take the risk to use other tools that dont have the protections HB does then you only have yourself to blame

 

You are really living in your own dream world.
Looking like 1-1,5 year back there have been several scans/ban waves comparing to the years before that extremely many ppl managed to bot almost trouble free (only when ppl where botting stupid they got cought). Your claims are taken out of your rear end tbh. Many of the other bots have trip-wire systems as well, would be foolish of them not to have. I have seen you comment on many user posts where they are just sharing their thoughts on the matter with bs like this.
And the thing about what some ppl are saying "botting is as safe now as i always been" is a right out lie. There have never been this many ppl getting banned like the last 1,5 years if you look back like 5 years. The thing is that Blizzard is catching up on HB and that is a fact.
I am not promoting any other bots but you have some point in what you said that HB is heavy targeted but if ppl are just looking for rotation bots for example and don't want the risk of getting detected within some months there is better bots than HB for this that isn't as targeted, but for farming HB is still the way to go (kamikaze style).

 

every bot has had banwaves some even had banwaves because of "collateral damage" from bliz going after HB! if they can get banned from collateral damage imagine if bliz was actively targeting them like they do with HB other bots are NOT safe, bliz only wants ppl to think that so HB loses business. bliz attacks them through courts (legal), PR/business (lose sales) and bans by trying to disable the tripwire which they succeded one or two times. people just blame HB for the bans when it could be the other bots they use that dont have the same protections hb does, its so selfish. Also I read that raphus is starting to realise HB should have moved to 64 bit just for PR reasons, because the other bots you think are safe (which are not) will get ban hammered the second HB was on 64bit through collateral damage! I hope HB makes 64bit bot only for that reason, because it wont be any safer but all the haters will realise that HB was the best choice all along

 

maybe boss should contact this guy

Epic Sues German Modder For Selling Paragon Hack
Selling a hack that is "impossible to detect" is one way to piss off a developer enough to sue you. This guy is going to be in a world of hurt too because there really isn't a defense in this case either.

Epic is suing for copyright infringement, unfair competition and breach of contract, and is requesting a judge order all versions of the software be destroyed. Their justification for suing in California comes from their attempts to take down YouTube videos advertising the hack under the justification of the Digital Millenium Copyright act.

 

You are really mentioning things that are totally irrelevant to what I am saying, and for other ppls posts that you are commenting on. I have never said that other bots are safe, I am only implying that they are SAFER if you count the banwaves and ppl getting banned the last 1-1,5 years. The thing that you mentioned that ppl using other bots at the same time than HB, I can tell you by my own exp here that it is usually the other way around.You can't say that there is a pattern for ppl using other bots while using HB if you look at the ban reports. It would be fun to know the statistics on this cuz as far as I have been reading the ban section for some time it is like 1/3 of the ppl using other software together with HB.
I have seen that you are posting nonsense for quite some time now and the same BS that is coming from you tbh. What is your agenda? Are you trying to make friends with the developers by doing this or are you just annoying ppl?
The thing you are saying with HB moving to 64-bit just for PR-reasons are just upright laughable...

 

Bots being attacked via process scrutiny or client-side checks is only really 20-30% of the footprints Blizzard could use to track your bot behaviours.

eg.

Questing. If you for example do a quest-line back to back (AFK or not) your precision rating is quite high, in fact near perfect in both time between quest completions and kill/death ratio(s) (depending on levels). Feed the entire database into a SQL Reporting style solution and any idiot with basic SQL skills could generate reports on behaviour patterns using this alone to identify potential scores/weights for an account that was deemed problematic. On top of this, if the person(s) themselves have engaged in pure questing back to back for 4hrs+ no breaks, than that is suspicious as well, especially if you then compare / contrast this a median average of "players in total". Humans are susceptible to fatigue, toilet breaks etc.. bots aren't. Like i've said, imperfection is the only way to mask perfection, so botting non-stop is easily detectable irregardless of what bot client you adopt.

Combat. Imperfection is important, having the top-ranked DPS in Recount with a bot should be the one thing you don't go hunting for. In fact most of these combat routines need to bake more imperfection into their sequences / randomization to give the appearance of human flaws. If you've died in WoW you see that "recap" button, that says "we are logging your entire fighting behaviour in chunks" ...keep that in mind.

Using HB or other bots is moot, i'm more open to the idea of further purchases with more passive solutions that mask the perfection with imperfection to be honest.

 

That's the point. The membership is not for everyone. It's an offer you are not forced to take it
If you are not happy with the offer, stay with what you already have. Some don't need it, others can't afford it, and last but not least some simply don't want it. FINE!
I made this clear in one of my first posts in this thread already.

 

While this is true, I'm afraid the future direction will be towards this membership model and the rest who are not in it will be left out in the cold.

Regards,
JG

 

You do not need to afraid JGreen,

I am sure Bossland GmbH, like each private company on the Internet rely most on the scale of its customer base. Their ground gets more solid with each new customer serviced.

So, as long as they service their customers, the customers would support them back, and they would have the enough power, to keep the legal pace and defend in the court vs Blizz.


For a very rough reference, I could mention the popular "Candy Crush Saga" mobile game for iPhone and Android from the mobile games portal king.com, last year their customer base have grown up to 100 million of unique installations just for the major game of their portfolio, and they got sold for $5.9 billion!

Fortune.com - Why Activision spent $5.9 billion on 'Candy Crush' creator King Digital

 

Business models change all the time and people are afraid of changes. It's human but there is no need to worry in this case.
If you own a product everything stays the same for you. This is an offer for people who want to support us in addition to buying our products and for sure they will see and get the benefit of things first.
Does not mean we will forget about all the others or you loose something you currently have

 

how do i buy legionbuddy i dont see it on the frontpage like honorbuddy demonbuddy?

 

Forget it..

Blizzard will make short process of this.
-This is a simple marketing trick to push as much money out of the community before it dies out again.
The majority of Honorbuddy users atm. are risking their account just by logging in more or less. U might as well buy a stock of new wow accounts, unless you are really keen on getting it to run "safely".

With all the shit flying around Blizzard -vs- Bossland, Blizz simply has the more money.
-Soon they'll detect the new botting system released here, then it'll be the same all over again. There might be a year of safety with a bit of luck but after that, it'll be every half year ban again followed by similar bots getting detected cus of similarity in patterns and then prices for these kinds of memberships will fall.

However, that is just my 2 cents

 

SHUT UP and take my money. Where do we buy?

 

The same way you buy honorbuddy...

Go to http://www.honorbuddy.com/
Look on the right hand side of the screen, you may need to scroll down a little
Click the Buy Now! button

 

lol. I've been reading your posts and it is what I wanted to say exactly.
Many people and even some devs are saying that your facts are wrong but could they point out which one? Nope.
Every people hating your posts are arguing with no backed up facts. There is no arguing about that.
Legendary Buddy is considered as a product that costs 200$ and if devs are not going to clearly state what they are going to provide the users... we all know it's not promising by looking at buddy's past records.

 

Its healthy to theorycraft.

I suggest all of us to get our tinfoil hats on!

Seriously, botting was always hazard and it will always be, simply because its against Blizzard's EULA/TOU, and they could do whatever they like to with "our" aka their accounts, they were generous to allow us to play/bot on.

Of course, we could do whatever we like to, if we feel our rights as customers are violated!

Regarding the detection, its a cat vs mouse game, sometimes the cat wins, sometimes the mouse. But if anyone remember the Tom & Jerry cartoon, the mouse always win! With huge margin

 

Guess you didnt hear about legion buddy it is a passive bot which means it will be virtually undetectable

 

Prove to me where it says being "passive" has anything to do with being undetectable.

You are spewing lies and false statements in an effort to keep a dying bot alive. Nothing is undetectable. I repeat nothing is.

 

If its a passive bot that doesnt inject in the game memory it is because its against privacy