Buddystore is the problem here

if a dev does this he/she will loose all of his/her reputation; i hope no one of us store devs is that dumb.
regarding lua: not everything but there are a lot of lua calls, indeed. i dont carry enough knowlege of the core in general but that is by far one of the "best"/"solid" therories
all of this is speculation however, you could also claim "click to move is saved serversided, blizz banned all c2m-users on 32 bit systems" - no one can prove it anyway

 

yes all those threads about how blizz detected hb are pretty useless.
If its true that blizz scanned only in a certain time frame and know one has noticed (as it seems)
nobody can clearly say how it was done. and we dont know if current hb will be undetected if blizz starts scanning again or?

 

This is not true. Blizz sends a packet to the client requesting Warden start up and scan the memory space for known hacks about every 15 seconds. Warden scans, then sends a yes or no (to simplify things) back to Blizz in response.

 

Thats maybe true. i dunno.
I was referring to this "special" time frame mentioned in the ban reports. Something from end of april to the beginning of may. if this really true.
But that would make sense. I mean to only add a scan module for a certain time frame. So when the scan is finished the scan module gets removed and bot devs have hard time to figure out what has caused the detection.
Im also curious about that warden thing... i mean everybody is like warden here warden there... what if blizz silently added something else and everybody missed it because of this warden focusing. Maybe thats new scanning engine is hidden in the battle net app or the browser proxy xD

 

guy guy, "keep calm <3" we talk again when we back in November and i bet the Devs will find out why and how to fix it by the time. what i said it's one place where they should look again.

 

U need to get your money back dawg! Clearly u haven't learnt shit

 

You'll be banned soon so kinda pointless to compare with a suicide botter (giving you the benefit of the doubt here)